We have run a highly successful rat control community-based programme
for the last ten years. This programme uses a bait block containing bromadiolone
as an active ingredient. The design of these blocks was to have a very low, to
no, secondary kill. In other words, if something ate a dead or dying poisoned
rat it would not also be poisoned. We felt this was important because of
domestic cats and dogs in the area. When you have a programme like this it is
important that you have the majority of people in the area on your side and we
would not get that if we were knocking off their cats and dogs. Incidentally,
some baits, brodifacoum for example, are designed to have a secondary kill.
This bait, which goes under a number of proprietary names, is freely available
at most hardware stores.
Successive programmes around the country which have tried to
get a good knock down of rat numbers using only traps, have never been
successful. Remember it is not how many rats you catch, but the number of rats
left. Rats are prolific breeders with one pair in spring potentially responsible
for up to 2000 offspring by late autumn. Therefore, our aim has been to
eradicate all resident / breeding rats and then knock out reinvasion to prevent
the rats getting re-established. To date we believe we have been successful.
So why look at traps? The use of toxins has never been
ideal.
There are two motivations for this trial. One is that ruru /
morepork owls nest in the gully. They catch mice. Mice also feed on the poison
baits. Although the bait should have a low secondary kill, we do not know what effect
it would have on chicks. Secondly Hamilton City Council has always been uncomfortable with our community-based programme.
Owl with mouse at nest in Mangaiti Gully